INGAA and the DEGT Pipelines, the Intervenors in Support of Respondent (hereinafter “Intervenors”), adopt the Commission’s statement of the ROFR issue:
Whether the Commission reasonably concluded that no term-matching cap was necessary for the right of first refusal because existing regulatory controls prevent the exercise of pipeline market power, and a term cap would distort the market and preclude the efficient allocation of capacity to the shipper valuing it the most.
Related
Natural Gas & Power Industries’ Reliability Alliance:
Exploring Real-Life Challenges with Ensuring Natural Gas Availability for Power and Joint Industry Suggested Mitigation Strategies INGAA Comments on FERC NOPR on Cybersecurity Incentives for Electric Utilities INGAA Incident Reporting Comments INGAA API Petition for Consideration of Gas Transmission Final Rule
Exploring Real-Life Challenges with Ensuring Natural Gas Availability for Power and Joint Industry Suggested Mitigation Strategies INGAA Comments on FERC NOPR on Cybersecurity Incentives for Electric Utilities INGAA Incident Reporting Comments INGAA API Petition for Consideration of Gas Transmission Final Rule
